By Months: Enn Eesmaa

Total Months: 11

Fully Profiled: 11

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

2 Speeches

Direct opponents or objects of criticism are not named; the focus is on the strategic defense of Estonia's positions and the achievement of its goals. Regarding the presidential election, criticism is aimed more at the deficiencies of the current system rather than at specific individuals.
Details View Details
09.2025

3 Speeches

There is no criticism of political opponents or opposing political groups. Rain Epler's remark is mentioned, but it is only used as an introduction to an apolitical observation regarding the Hungarian style of speech.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

A direct confrontation is not expressed, but the speaker indirectly criticizes the procedure that grants representatives the privilege of reviewing documents while leaving the public uninformed. The criticism is aimed at procedural transparency, not at individuals.
Details View Details
12.2024

3 Speeches

There is no information regarding direct opposition or criticism aimed at political opponents. The speech focuses on conducting the procedure and responding to questions from colleagues. Instead of criticism, the speaker engages in fact clarification directed at a colleague.
Details View Details
11.2024

1 Speeches

There is not enough data.
Details View Details
09.2024

2 Speeches

The criticism targets parliamentary procedures that impede dialogue with the prime minister, despite the PM being prepared and articulate. There is no direct political opposition to the government; rather, the focus is on a procedural deficiency that blocked the opportunity to answer questions.
Details View Details
07.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

Criticism targets the procedural tactics employed by the bill's sponsors (the Conservative People's Party of Estonia faction, Leo Kunnas, Alar Laneman), citing "legal obstructionist mass amendment proposals" that resulted in delays. The substantive opposition concerns the draft bill's legal imprecision and impracticality regarding the storage of weapons.
Details View Details
05.2024

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at those who permitted the construction of the glass pavilion, and indirectly, at the passivity of heritage protection authorities and UN organizations during its erection. The opposition is intense and focuses on procedural failure and the object’s aesthetic incompatibility with the park environment.
Details View Details
04.2024

1 Speeches

The confrontation is directed at the representative of the Reform Party, who previously served as the relevant minister, thereby calling into question his and the party's ability to resolve issues concerning remuneration. The criticism focuses on the failure of policy implementation, not on a personal level. Although the speaker avoids an accusatory tone, he demands explanations from the opposing side regarding the causes of these failures.
Details View Details
03.2024

1 Speeches

Insufficient data
Details View Details
Back to Profiling