Session Profile: Helir-Valdor Seeder
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-12-17
Political Position
The political position is strongly critical of the current state budget and the process by which it was handled, emphasizing that due to its lack of transparency, the budget is potentially unconstitutional. This stance is procedural and outcome-based, focusing on the legality and clarity of the state's finances. The speaker also questions why the president failed to return the budget, citing systemic irregularities.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the handling of the state budget, constitutionality, and the operations of oversight institutions (the Chancellor of Justice, the Auditor General). Technical terminology is employed, and direct reference is made to the extremely sharp criticism leveled by the Auditor General and the Chancellor of Justice, which indicates a profound understanding of the subject matter.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and interrogative, employing rhetorical questions to underscore the gravity of the situation ("How have we arrived in such a situation?"). The appeal is strongly logical and relies on citing the evaluations of authorities (supervisory bodies) to lend weight to the critique.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is no data regarding the frequency or rhythm of appearances. They appeared at the plenary session as the questioner, directing their question to the former Minister of Justice.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is leveled against the government or the budget drafters because the budget is non-transparent and violates the constitution. The criticism is intense and procedural, extending accountability to the president as well, who, in the speaker's view, should have sent the bill back.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It refers to the bill submitted by the Isamaa party aimed at bringing the State Budget Act into compliance with the Constitution, which demonstrates support for that party's legislative initiative. Direct cooperation is not described, but the support is clear.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on the national level, addressing the constitutionality of the state budget and the activities of state oversight bodies. There is no regional focus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus primarily on the transparency of the state budget and fiscal prudence. There is a demand that the budget be fundamentally comprehensible and comply with constitutional requirements, referencing the need for strict and clear public sector expenditure.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on reforming the State Budget Act in order to bring it into compliance with the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia. The speaker supports the corresponding bill submitted by Isamaa, emphasizing its significance before Parliament.
1 Speeches Analyzed