Session Profile: Helir-Valdor Seeder
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
2024-06-14
Political Position
The political position centers on procedural action, underscoring the necessity of voting on the proposed amendments. The speaker’s position is rooted in both policy and values, as they demand a vote and issue a warning, urging their colleagues to consider the consequences of their decisions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and direct, focusing on procedural requests and utilizing polite address ("Honorable Chairman"). The speaker includes a brief, measured appeal to consider the consequences of the vote, which functions as a logical appeal rather than an emotional plea.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker was active during the plenary session on June 14, 2024, making three interventions in a short period, all focused on demanding a vote on amendments. This indicates active participation in the session's procedural matters.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The objection is indirect, aimed at colleagues who may not be considering the consequences of their vote. The criticism itself is procedural and measured, not personal, and specific opponents are not named.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperative style is formally polite, involving respectfully addressing the chair of the session and making a direct appeal to colleagues. There is no information regarding cross-party cooperation or the search for compromises.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward ensuring the voting of amendments, which demonstrates an active role in carrying out the legislative procedure. The speaker acts as the initiator of procedural steps and emphasizes the importance of legislative decisions, referencing the need to consider their consequences.
3 Speeches Analyzed