Agenda Profile: Helir-Valdor Seeder

National Security

2024-04-03

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Political Position
The priority is national security, specifically through the revocation of voting rights for third-country nationals in local elections—a measure deemed necessary due to the perceived security threat. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's inaction regarding security matters while simultaneously implementing aggressive tax hikes (including the car tax and the sugar tax). The political framework is heavily results-oriented, faulting the government for setting incorrect priorities and "gambling" with national security.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in security and legislative procedures, referencing reports from security agencies and his involvement in negotiations. He has detailed knowledge of government tax packages and legal precedents, citing, for instance, the challenge to the pension reform in the Supreme Court. He stresses the necessity of initiating the legislative process to test its constitutionality.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is sharp, critical, and insistent, accusing the Prime Minister and the Reform Party of "playing games" and treating security as a secondary concern. Logical appeals are employed, contrasting the swift implementation of taxes with the dragging out of security issues, and a profound plea is made to initiate the process. The style is formal, yet it contains strong accusations and rhetorical questions.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu chamber, posing pointed questions to the Prime Minister regarding the government's inaction on security matters. They reference the submission of bills initiated by Isamaa and their participation in negotiations with security agencies. They stress that the government has been completely inactive for an entire year.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponent is the Reform Party and the ruling coalition, who stand accused of voting down Isamaa's security-related draft legislation and neglecting national security. Separate criticism is leveled at the Minister of the Interior, who is deemed an additional security threat due to the arbitrary interpretation of reports issued by security agencies. The criticism is intense and addresses both the substance of the policy and procedural inaction.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a low level of cooperation with the governing coalition, criticizing their refusal to back the draft legislation initiated by Isamaa. He points out that the Social Democrats within the coalition oppose the revocation of voting rights, which is stalling progress. He urges the initiation of a legislative process to find a solution, either through an amendment to the law or a constitutional change.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national security and legislation, but the negotiations of the Tallinn City Council are also mentioned. He emphasizes that the issue of voting rights has been raised specifically within the context of Tallinn, which the government criticizes, even though the matter should have been resolved at the Riigikogu (Parliament) level.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strong opposition to the government's fiscal policy, particularly the rapid implementation of several tax hike packages (including the car tax, sugar tax, and increases in excise duties and state fees). He/She criticizes the fact that the government has prioritized and pushed through the implementation of these taxes more forcefully than addressing security issues.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The most important social issue is the revocation of the voting rights of third-country citizens in local elections, which is being treated directly as a security concern. He/She emphasizes the need to amend the legal framework to ensure national security.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is the processing of the draft bill, introduced by Isamaa in the Riigikogu, concerning the removal of voting rights from third-country nationals. It is the initiator and proponent, criticizing the government both for voting down this bill and for the unworkable solution agreed upon in the coalition agreement.

2 Speeches Analyzed