Agenda Profile: Helir-Valdor Seeder
Government coalition policy
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to the government coalition’s strategic energy policy decision, which is deemed detrimental to the state and involves the allocation of billions of euros. The criticism targets the procedure itself, emphasizing that crucial decisions are being made by a narrow circle before Parliament has had a chance to debate the Climate Law and the Energy Sector Development Plan. The focus remains squarely on the transparency and accountability of the government's actions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of energy and financial accounting, highlighting specific amounts (e.g., 2.6 billion in subsidies, 1 billion for the Paldiski site liability, 60 million euros in monthly reserve fees) and technical factors such as network tariffs and CO2 policy. Furthermore, they possess knowledge of the legislative process (the Climate Law, EAK) and the coordination of cross-border environmental impact.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and demanding, emphasizing the lack of transparency and procedural errors. Strong accusations (e.g., "the three wise men") and figurative expressions (e.g., "carrying light in a sack like the fools of Kilplased") are used, demanding concrete answers and the public disclosure of accounts. The appeal is primarily logical, focusing on missing calculations and violations of the law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is too little data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main adversary is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized both for the manner in which decisions are made (by a narrow circle) and for the substance of its policies (specifically energy). The criticism is intense, citing a lack of transparency, the exclusion of the Minister of Finance, and suspicious ties to firms connected with the Reform Party and the Social Democrats.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is too little data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national energy policy, but it includes a significant regional and cross-border dimension. Specifically, the impact of the Latvian wind farms (Lode-Penuja) on the Mulgi municipality is cited as an example, and the state is criticized for its inability to coordinate cross-border activities and assist local governments.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views are critical of the government’s planned extensive and opaque state spending (billions of euros in subsidies and infrastructure investments), which will burden taxpayers and consumers. Emphasis is placed on the need to disclose the underlying calculations and avoid inefficient expenditures tied to political interests.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is too little data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on ensuring the procedural correctness of the discussion and adoption of the Climate Law and the Energy Management Development Plan. The speaker demands that Parliament debate these documents before the governing coalition makes strategic decisions involving billions of euros. He is fighting against procedural shortcomings and demands the public disclosure of the relevant calculations.
2 Speeches Analyzed