Agenda Profile: Helir-Valdor Seeder
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political position is vehemently opposed to the ratification of the agreement on the enforcement of prison sentences between Estonia and Sweden (682 SE). This stance is driven by criticism of the government’s irresponsibility and the anticipation of an impending change of government, which would quickly terminate the agreement, thereby causing confusion between the two states. The political framework is strongly outcome-oriented, highlighting the government’s low level of support and its lack of legitimacy across the broader political spectrum.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topics of legislative procedure and political accountability, emphasizing the risks associated with the premature termination of the contract and the impact on government support ratings. He/She is also meticulous in distinguishing between the ministry's internal working papers and the actual positions held by the former Minister of Justice (Lea Danilson-Järg), thereby defending the stance of the Isamaa party.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, forceful, and directly advisory, including recommendations for the minister to halt the proceedings ("take a time-out"). Logical arguments are employed, based on political forecasts (a change of government) and emphasizing accountability in international relations. The minister is directly accused of demagoguery.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu session, presenting questions and proposals to the minister during the continuation of the first reading of Draft Act 682 SE. He/She is prepared to publicly promise future political steps (termination of the agreement) should the bill be approved now.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the governing coalition, which is being criticized for its irresponsibility and narrow base of support in pushing the bill through. Criticism is also directed at the minister, who is accused of demagogically misrepresenting Isamaa's former position. The opposition is united and promises to continue its resistance even after a change of government.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is distinctly oppositional, highlighting the unified resistance of all opposition parties to the agreement. There is no readiness for compromise with the government; instead, they are demanding the complete suspension of the proceedings, citing a future government that will terminate the contract.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on international relations (agreements between Estonia and Sweden), as well as national legislation and political stability. There are no references to specific local or regional problems in Estonia.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
In the social sector, we address topics concerning the execution of prison sentences and judicial administration, which are related to security and public order. The emphasis is placed on procedural and interstate risks, rather than social impact.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on suspending the proceedings of Bill 682 SE (Agreement on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences between Estonia and Sweden) and opposing it. The speaker is a strong opponent of the bill and promises to advocate in the future for the termination of the agreement at the earliest opportunity.
2 Speeches Analyzed