By Plenary Sessions: Luisa Rõivas

Direct political opponents are not criticized; rather, the criticism is aimed at Europe’s technological lag compared to America and Asia. There is also an indirect reproach regarding the previous inability to utilize 100% of the available support funds.

There is no direct opposition, but questions are being raised and clarifications sought regarding the rationale and metrics of the policy (e-residency growth forecasts) presented by the rapporteur. The criticism is directed at the methodology of policy implementation, rather than at individuals.

The criticism is directed at the government’s lack of a long-term fiscal plan and the capacity of agencies to effectively utilize rapidly increasing defense expenditures. The opposition is not focused on the substance of the policy itself (defense spending), but rather on the procedures for its implementation and risk management.

There is too little data.

The criticism is aimed at the general standard and conduct of the Riigikogu, which is being called a kindergarten—a procedural and behavioral standoff. There is a lightly humorous reference to Jüri Ratas, but an intense political attack is absent.

This opposition is aimed at those who deem the provision of the service fundamentally wrong and focus solely on fetal rights. The criticism is political and legal, stressing that the opponents' arguments ignore the pregnant woman's constitutional rights to life and health. The speaker rejects the opposing side's claim regarding the ridicule of parents from large families.

The criticism is aimed at the EKRE faction, which submitted a total of 50 amendments to its own draft bill for the purpose of obstruction—amendments that were later withdrawn. The criticism is strictly procedural, not substantive, and emphasizes the delaying of the bill by the initiators themselves.

There is no direct confrontation with political opponents, but the speaker defends the Riigikogu's right to issue statements while responding to questions that challenged the legitimacy of the statement. The political opposition is aimed at the Georgian government's anti-European Union policy.

The criticism is aimed at the past and present stewardship of the nation's finances, which has resulted in a deepening budget deficit and a manifold increase in the debt burden. Specific opponents or groups are not criticized by name; the focus remains on the policy outcomes and the absence of financial discipline.

There is no direct criticism aimed at domestic political opponents. Criticism is instead directed at Western allies (the EU, US) regarding the insufficient volume of aid, which is preventing a quick Ukrainian victory. The strongest concern relates to Donald Trump's potential second term and the threat that would pose to allied relations.