By Agendas: Luisa Rõivas

The speaker demonstrates significant expertise regarding EU financial frameworks (MFF, Cohesion Policy) and geopolitical security strategy. Technical terms such as the convergence machine and digital sovereignty are employed, and specific infrastructure projects like Rail Baltica are referenced. A detailed vision is presented for integrating artificial intelligence into education, including the necessity of developing Estonian-specific engines.

Demonstrates expertise in the field of e-residency and the digital economy, focusing specifically on the concept of cardless e-residency. It emphasizes the need to measure economic benefit (company formation, investments) and social cohesion, posing detailed questions regarding the measurement methodology.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in managing public finances and defense spending. Specific terminology is employed, such as "deficit inertia," and the speaker references the percentage deficit (4.5%) and the proportion of defense spending contributing to that deficit. Particular emphasis is placed on the ability of procurement and decision-making processes to keep pace with the budgetary timeline, citing procedural risks.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in culture and sports policy, drawing on 15 years of experience in socio-economic impact assessment practice. Statistical data is utilized, highlighting that cinema attendance is the most popular form of cultural expression, even though film production itself is both time-consuming and costly. The expertise specifically focuses on strategic funding and the economic impact generated by the cultural sector.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of music and performance, performing a Bee Gees song with Estonian lyrics tied to personal childhood memories. Additionally, they possess practical expertise regarding sports (triathlon) and cycling infrastructure (specifically, the Riigikogu bicycle parking facility and the necessity of having pumps available).

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of both the medical and economic aspects of the abortion procedure, noting the necessity of qualified healthcare professionals and the true cost of the procedure, which necessitates multiple doctor visits. Furthermore, the speaker references the constitutional protection afforded to the life and health of the pregnant woman, thereby exhibiting legal awareness.

The speaker demonstrates thorough expertise regarding the procedural processes of the Riigikogu and the work of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Exact dates are provided concerning the deliberation of the draft bill, the withdrawal of amendments, and consensus-based committee decisions. Furthermore, the speaker is aware of the value of the consulate's work and the situation of the Estonians residing there.

The speaker demonstrates strong expertise in the procedural rules and procedures of the Riigikogu, precisely describing the bill's progress, deadlines, the decisions of the lead committee, and the withdrawal of obstruction. Normative-technical and procedural terms are used (e.g., "lead committee," "consensus," "normative-technical amendments").

The expert assessment is clearly linked to the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the work of the Foreign Affairs Committee, addressing the adoption of amendments by consensus and the bill's timeline. It also demonstrates awareness of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' competence in deciding on the use of foreign aid and financial resources. There are no references to personal feelings or the word count of the explanatory memorandum, focusing instead on facts and procedure.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of macroeconomic indicators, citing the worsening state budget deficit and the rapid increase in the debt burden. Technical terms such as "budget balance target" and "deficit reduction" are employed, indicating a focus on fiscal discipline and budgetary management.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of foreign policy, security history, and the financing of international aid. Specifically highlighted is the historical evolution of the allied presence in Estonia since 2014, and the ability to compare the amounts of aid to Ukraine (50 billion) with EU pandemic funds (15 times greater).