By Plenary Sessions: Marek Reinaas

The style is formal, factual, and informative, focusing on procedural details and facts, such as committee meeting dates and consensus decisions. Logical explanations are used to justify the technical necessity of the draft legislation. Specific, large-scale examples, such as the Tallinn-Helsinki tunnel and Chinese state subsidies, are used to illustrate the impact of the law.

The speaker's rhetorical style is interrogative and slightly accusatory, utilizing rhetorical questions to challenge the motives and behavior of others. Strong expressions are used, such as "a strange, not to say striking story," and an answer is sought to the question of whether this constituted "parliamentary bullying."