By Plenary Sessions: Marek Reinaas

The rhetorical style is analytical, persuasive, and at times defensive, particularly when addressing accusations regarding the involvement of the minister and the Competition Authority. The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments (rule of law, economic efficiency) and party ideology, employing formal and procedural language. He urges support for the legislation, emphasizing its benefits for both consumers and businesses.

The rhetorical style is formal, detailed, and procedural, focusing on the delivery of facts and Commission decisions to the plenary session. The speech is logical and neutral, devoid of emotional appeals; the objective is to explain the decisions that have been made and the subsequent schedule.

The rhetorical style is formal, factual, and extremely detailed, focusing on logical appeal and the presentation of procedural facts (dates, lists of organizations, voting results). The tone is justificatory and confident, repeatedly emphasizing the "more than democratic" nature of the bill's procedure.

The style is structured and formal, adhering to the points typical of an expert report (Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, etc.). The tone is analytical and informative, emphasizing logical arguments and the use of data. It employs metaphors (e.g., "Competitiveness is not a sprint, but a marathon") and conveys moderate optimism regarding the adaptability of the Estonian economy, while also expressing concern about productivity and demographics.