Agenda Profile: Marek Reinaas
Chair implementation
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Political Position
The political position heavily focuses on challenging the correctness of the parliament's rules of procedure and the decisions made by the session chair. The speaker sharply criticizes the conduct of a specific deputy (Lauri Läänemets), suspecting that it constituted deliberately poor behavior or "parliamentary bullying." The central focus is on ensuring the internal conduct and procedural integrity of the parliament.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in parliamentary procedural rules and the chairing of sessions, analyzing the admissibility of time extensions and the obligations of Members of Parliament. He/She also shows knowledge of the committee's internal organization, noting that the bill mentioned by Läänemets was the final item on the committee's agenda.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and questioning, repeatedly employing rhetorical questions to assess the correctness of the incident ("Did... act correctly?"). The address is narrative, detailing the event that took place at the close of the previous session, and concludes with an accusatory speculation about "parliamentary bullying."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker becomes active immediately following the controversial events that transpired in parliament, raising a point of order at the subsequent sitting. This pattern of action indicates a rapid response to breaches of parliamentary rules or suspicious conduct.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at Lauri Läänemets’s conduct, as he is accused of potentially improper and deliberate obstruction of parliamentary proceedings. The criticism addresses both his personal motivation and the procedural justification, casting doubt on his claim of urgency. Furthermore, the propriety of the presiding officer’s decision is also being questioned.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, there was an indirect mention of a bill concerning cats and dogs currently being processed by the committee, indicating awareness of legislation related to animal welfare. However, the speaker did not express a substantive position on the draft law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed towards the strict adherence to Parliament's rules of procedure and procedural regulations, rather than the substance of specific draft legislation. The speaker acts more as a guardian of procedures, questioning the propriety of the actions taken by the session chair and the member of parliament.
2 Speeches Analyzed