Agenda Profile: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) – third reading
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is centered on the accelerated procedure of Bill 640 SE and questions surrounding its constitutionality. The speaker strongly objects to the unusual speed of the proceedings, stressing that this is "a genuinely serious matter" and referencing the Chancellor of Justice's doubts regarding compliance with the constitution. The stance is heavily procedural, underscoring the necessity of avoiding dangerous precedents.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the Riigikogu's procedural rules, emphasizing the danger of setting a precedent and the unusual nature of the time between readings. Knowledge of the constitutional review process is also highlighted, referencing the Chancellor of Justice's positions and inquiring about the procedures following a presidential veto.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is critical and procedural, centering on logical arguments and established norms ("this is not customary," "precedent"). The speaker employs direct questions to challenge the rationale behind the accelerated procedure (the arrival of summer), stressing the seriousness of the issue and the absence of any need for haste ("There's no rush whatsoever").
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in the legislative process, repeatedly raising questions regarding procedural rules and constitutionality during the same sitting day. This pattern of activity indicates a focus on critical bills during their final phase of consideration.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at those accelerating the process (the commission), criticizing both their stated justifications (the arrival of summer) and the unusual procedure itself. The criticism is intense, focusing specifically on the violation of procedural rules and the resulting threat to constitutionality.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on opposing the handling of Bill 640 SE (money laundering prevention and sanctions) and demanding procedural correctness. The speaker is taking the opposing stance, insisting that constitutionality be guaranteed and inquiring about the detailed procedural steps should the President potentially issue a veto.
2 Speeches Analyzed