Agenda Profile: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Draft law amending the Local Government Electoral Act and the Act on Churches and Parishes (544 SE) - Second Reading
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The politician is strongly against Bill 544 SE, urging a 'no' vote because, in his estimation, the legislation is flawed. The core objection is procedural and value-based, criticizing the combination of two only indirectly related issues—local elections and church law—into a single bill. The proposed change to the electoral procedure is also criticized, with the implication that this move is being made because it is impossible to win elections through honest effort.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures and history, citing as an example the 2008 case regarding the change of electoral rules in Tallinn, where various topics were similarly merged. He or she is familiar with the specifics of processing draft legislation, including the tactics used for rejecting proposed amendments and reconciling different bills. Particular emphasis is placed on the timing issues related to the constitutional amendment and the entry into force of the associated draft law.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, procedural, and combative, focusing on flaws in the legislation and the motives of the coalition. To persuade the audience, the speaker employs a historical analogy (the 2008 change to Tallinn's electoral procedure) to demonstrate a recurring pattern in how the rules are changed. The tone is direct and accusatory, emphasizing the sheer absurdity and ridiculousness of the current situation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is sharply criticized for procedural errors and political dishonesty. The criticism is aimed at the coalition's failure to consider the opposition's amendments, even when they agree that the changes are necessary. The coalition is accused of changing the rules because they cannot win elections based on honest work.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker referred to the amendments proposed in the committee by her Center Party colleague, Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, which were subsequently rejected by the coalition. This demonstrates a willingness to cooperate within the opposition, but highlights the disappointment regarding the coalition's reluctance to process the opposition's proposals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The primary focus is on national legislation (at the Riigikogu level) concerning the electoral procedure for local governments. A regional focus is demonstrated through a historical example regarding the modification of Tallinn’s electoral procedure, used to illustrate unfair political tactics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social sector covers amendments to the Churches and Congregations Act, which regulate who is permitted to work in a church in Estonia. Furthermore, in a historical context, reference is made to the issues of equality and women's rights; amendments to the Tallinn electoral system were added to the related draft legislation in 2008.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the opposition to Draft Bill 544 SE, stressing the necessity for accurate and error-free legislation. Priority is given to adhering to procedural rules and drafting separate legislative proposals for amendments concerning church law. It is also emphasized that legislation related to a constitutional amendment should not take effect before the constitutional amendment itself comes into force.
1 Speeches Analyzed