Agenda Profile: Vadim Belobrovtsev
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Cybersecurity Act and Other Acts (Transposition of the Cybersecurity 2 Directive) (Bill 739 SE)
2025-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political stance centers on the transparency and comprehensibility of the legislation. The speaker criticizes the excessive length of the explanatory memorandum (nearly 140 pages) and demands that the minister provide a highly specific summary of the bill's core content, stressing procedural clarity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of the sheer volume of the legislative material, noting that the explanatory memorandum concerning the draft Cyber Security Act is 140 pages long. The expertise is focused more on the procedural side and documentation management, rather than the technical content of cyber security itself.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and straightforward, addressing the minister respectfully ("Esteemed Minister"), but raising a critical question regarding the length of the explanatory memorandum. The emphasis is on the logical requirement to receive a very specific and brief summary (2–3 sentences) of the complex material.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at the executive branch (the minister), criticizing the excessive length of the legislative material (the explanatory memorandum) and demanding clarification of its content. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the clarity of the bill's submission.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on Draft Bill 739 SE (which transposes the cybersecurity directive). The speaker's priority is simplifying the legislative material—the 140-page explanatory memorandum—and highlighting its core points, thereby acting as an advocate for clarity regarding the bill's content.
1 Speeches Analyzed