Agenda Profile: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (528 SE) – first reading
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
This political stance centers on bringing the accountability and work arrangements of Riigikogu members in line with the rules governing the rest of the Estonian population. The speaker emphatically demands that any absence must be justified; otherwise, the member should forfeit their salary. This position is framed as a requirement for fairness and results-based conduct, serving as a strong critique of the current system.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a thorough understanding of the Riigikogu's operational procedures and the legislative process, specifically citing the handling and voting on budget amendments. This expertise covers the parliament's internal rules and remuneration regulations, particularly in connection with Draft Bill 528 SE. Furthermore, they are capable of citing examples from previous political procedures, such as the comments made by the Chairman of the Finance Committee concerning the budget.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is skeptical and critical, conveying low optimism about the coalition's willingness to cooperate. The speaker employs a logical appeal, contrasting parliamentary work with a typical workplace environment to highlight the existing disparity. The tone is direct and inquiry-focused, with arguments grounded in previous negative experiences.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized for political hypocrisy. The criticism centers on the fact that the coalition acknowledges the constructive nature of the Centre Party faction's proposals, yet systematically votes them down, citing, for instance, last year's budget. The speaker also questions the coalition's willingness to operate under the same rules as the rest of the Estonian people.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The current mood regarding cooperation is disappointed and skeptical, as the speaker points to previous instances where the constructive proposals of the opposition (the Center Party) were rejected by the coalition. The speaker is not optimistic about the coalition's readiness for substantive cooperation, regardless of the quality of the proposals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives have an indirect bearing on public sector wage management and budget discipline, emphasizing the principle that wages should be tied to actual work/attendance. Reference is also made to previous constructive budget amendment proposals, demonstrating an interest in public finances.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The central social theme is the equality of responsibility and rules between members of the Riigikogu and ordinary citizens. The speaker demands social justice, insisting that politicians be subject to the same work obligation rules as the rest of the Estonian populace.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the Draft Act Amending the Riigikogu Member Status Act (528 SE), which addresses the attendance of Members of Parliament and the conditions for paying their salaries. The speaker is a strong supporter of this principle and is critical of the coalition’s unwillingness to establish equalizing rules.
1 Speeches Analyzed