Agenda Profile: Vadim Belobrovtsev
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
Political Position
The speaker is strongly opposed to the government's fiscal policy, criticizing the increase in VAT, income tax, and excise duties. He/She questions the ideological consistency of the Social Democratic Party, highlighting the removal of benefits from large families and the taxation of pensions. Furthermore, the negative impact of abolishing free public transport is emphasized, which signals support for the preservation of social benefits.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the details of tax policy (VAT, income tax, excise duties) and social measures (support for large families, taxation of pensions). He/She is also well-versed in the public transport reform and the previous positions held by the ministers associated with it.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and accusatory, focusing on highlighting the contradictions in political decisions and ideological consistency. Logical appeals are used, listing specific tax rates and cuts to social benefits to emphasize the negative impact of the government's actions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is limited to posing official questions in the Riigikogu during the debate on the motion of no confidence, which points to active participation in opposition oversight activities.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opponent is the Social Democratic Party and the ruling coalition, who are being criticized for political incoherence and the betrayal of social democratic ideology. The criticism is intense and focuses on political decisions that harm vulnerable groups (pensioners, large families).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on regional issues, highlighting the impact of abolishing free public transport specifically in the regions, and contrasting this with the idea of universal social support.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic stance is firmly opposed to tax hikes, particularly concerning VAT, income tax, and excise duties. There is support for social welfare distribution, coupled with criticism of taxing pensions and withdrawing benefits from large families—a clear indication of a desire to protect the lower-income segment of the population.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus of social issues is on economic well-being and social justice, particularly protecting the benefits provided to large families and pensioners from government cuts. Free public transportation is viewed as a universal social benefit.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on evaluating the actions and accountability of the Minister of Infrastructure, particularly concerning the public transport reform and broader coalition fiscal decisions that conflict with social democratic ideology.
3 Speeches Analyzed