Session Profile: Reili Rand
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
2025-05-13
Political Position
The speaker supports reducing sensible regulations, but their primary focus remains on guaranteeing the quality and availability of school meals. They adopt a strong social justice stance, stressing that children's nutrition should not be dependent on the size of the family's bank account. This position is deeply rooted in policy and values, calling for state intervention to alleviate existing inequalities.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in rural affairs and food policy, particularly concerning the financing of school meals, subsidies, and procurement regulations. They refer to a specific economic context, mentioning Estonia having the fastest food price increase in the European Union. Furthermore, they are familiar with previous initiatives, such as the organic food subsidy.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is analytical, concerned, and demanding, focusing on social justice and economic consequences. The speaker employs logical appeals, posing pointed questions to highlight the injustice of the situation, such as the issue of varying food quality for children. The tone is formal and geared toward finding solutions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker's pattern of activity involves active participation in the plenary session, specifically by posing detailed questions and subsequent follow-up questions to the Chairman of the Rural Affairs Committee. This clearly points toward legislative oversight and the exertion of political pressure aimed at resolving specific issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the political situation, where a lack of funds impedes positive initiatives and deepens inequality in the quality of school meals. The opposition is primarily directed at the current funding scheme, which forces parents to pay a co-payment, rather than at specific individuals.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is both inquisitive and demanding, specifically seeking concrete initiatives from the Rural Affairs Committee regarding school meals. Simultaneously, it acknowledges prior positive steps, such as the organic food subsidy, demonstrating a readiness for constructive dialogue and the promotion of best practices.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is directed toward national policy (school meals), but with a strong emphasis on supporting local food producers. The speaker stresses that quality and proximity should be the deciding factors when selecting raw materials, not merely the price tag.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives emphasize the necessity of easing the financial strain on families caused by rapid food price inflation. State subsidies (such as school meal support) are endorsed to ensure social equality, and the interests of local producers are prioritized over purely price-based procurement.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is equality in education and nutrition. The speaker calls for school meals to serve as an equalizing measure, ensuring every child gets a full meal, regardless of the family's economic situation, thereby countering the disparity in quality based on family wealth.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is to initiate changes to the school meal subsidy and establish new procurement rules that would favor healthier and locally sourced ingredients. The speaker is actively seeking these initiatives and demands specific draft bills from the Rural Affairs Committee.
4 Speeches Analyzed