By Months: Reili Rand

The rhetorical style is critical and at times aggressive, labeling the opposing side's claims as "absurd" and essentially "devoid of substance." The argumentation is logical and procedural, focusing on deficiencies in the process of making crucial decisions (specifically, the absence of a risk assessment). The tone is formal and appropriate for a parliamentary debate.

The rhetorical style is highly formal and courteous, utilizing addresses specific to the Riigikogu ("Honorable Speaker of the Riigikogu," "Esteemed Rapporteur"). The tone is appreciative and constructive, focusing on the logical framing of the issue in order to find a concrete solution within the legislative assembly.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing the esteemed Chairman of the Session and the Minister. The tone is constructive, expressing satisfaction with the joint regulation, but also includes an element of urgency due to the long-term delay of the positive credit register. The appeal is primarily logical and procedural.