By Agendas: Mati Raidma

Insufficient data.

There is no direct opposition; only a slight tension is mentioned between the interests of Estonia and Europe (ECB) concerning the draft law, which they aim to resolve through cooperation. The criticism is directed more toward a procedural inconsistency than toward a specific individual or group.

The criticism is not directed at specific opponents or groups. The criticism is aimed at the fragmentation and ambiguity of the current legal framework, noting that reading the laws regulating current crises means "you cannot understand anything at all."

Insufficient data.

The criticism is aimed at the manner of the proceedings, which is being called a "political race," and which prevents finding the right solution. The objection is procedural and denounces the political performance.

No data available

The primary criticism is leveled against Russia (the Russian Empire), which is accused of pursuing a policy of genocide against the Crimean Tatars that has lasted for centuries and continues today. The criticism is intense and political, focusing on persecution, imprisonment, torture, and the destruction of identity. The speaker stresses that such actions "cannot be tolerated under any circumstances."

There is no direct political confrontation or criticism aimed at specific opponents. The criticism is instead focused on the slow pace of work by the government and various agencies when preparing draft legislation, demanding the immediate handling of the Readiness Act, which integrates the organization of civil crisis management and national defense. Warnings are also issued regarding the risk of widespread fatigue and the danger of "crisis resilience" becoming just an empty slogan.

The main opponents are the Center Party and Isamaa factions, whose proposed amendments were rejected. The Center Party is being criticized because they did not offer alternative reduced rates, but instead sought to withdraw the proposed changes to the bill entirely.

No direct criticism is leveled at the opponents, but procedural opposition within the committee (3 votes against) regarding the further processing of the draft bill is noted. Opponents' questions (e.g., those from Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart and Liisa-Ly Pakosta) are answered factually, explaining the cost principle and the proposed benefit, rather than personally criticizing the opponents.

Insufficient data

The main adversaries have been clearly identified: Russia and its ally, Belarus. They are accused of undermining the security situation and engaging in "disruptive behavior" within the framework of the OSCE. The criticism is intense and action-oriented, as their activities directly affect Estonia as well.