By Plenary Sessions: Juku-Kalle Raid

There is no data regarding cooperation, compromises, or cross-party activity. The speech is an individual explanation of a viewpoint that focuses on personal experience.

The speaker is clearly acting on behalf of the faction (Eesti 200), emphasizing intra-party cooperation. The general call for support suggests a desire to achieve broader backing, but readiness for cross-party compromise is not described.

The cooperative approach is focused on informing colleagues and clarifying any confusion they may have, by providing historical and factual evidence regarding the nature of the Russian Church. The speaker requests that colleagues confirm that nothing has changed within the Russian Church, referencing the goal of reaching a shared understanding on the security matter.

The cooperation style is entirely confrontational and critical, particularly regarding Gaute Kivistik and the Eesti 200 party. There is a complete absence of any reference to a willingness to compromise, mediation, or cross-party collaboration.

Reference is being made to a previous agreement, which involved various parties (Eesti 200, Jaak Aab), demonstrating a historical willingness for cooperation or negotiation. The current action is aimed at confirming and serving as a reminder of the result of that cooperation.

The style of cooperation is non-confrontational, emphasizing that there are usually no "very ugly disputes" in the Foreign Affairs Committee. This points to a preference for calm, consensus-driven committee work, where decisions are made without major disagreements.

The speaker references a recent discussion with "your party colleague," which demonstrates an openness to cross-party dialogue and the joint resolution of issues. The tone is collaborative and inquisitive, seeking the partner's perspective.

The cooperation is evidenced by a reference to colleague Toomas Uibo, who recalled previous violations of procedural rules, using this argument in support of his procedural point.

There is not enough data.

The speaker observes a broad consensus regarding the goal of relocating the monument, noting that "the entire Riigikogu is actually of one mind," although there are disagreements over the methods. On this specific issue, support is voiced for EKRE's stance ("I am for EKRE today"), but they refuse to go along with the arguments of the Social Democrats.