By Months: Juku-Kalle Raid

The political position is strongly supportive of the current proposal being put forward on behalf of the Eesti 200 faction. This stance is values-driven, emphasizing the necessity of ending the legacy of the Estonian SSR "for the sake of protocol and history."

The political focus is on national security and repelling foreign (Kremlin) influence within Estonian religious communities. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the subordination of the Moscow Patriarchate in Estonia, deeming it absurd and linking it directly to Patriarch Kirill, who supports genocide. This stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing loyalty to Estonia and warning that nothing has changed in the Russian church since the Stalinist era.

The political focus is centered on demanding the fulfillment of previous agreements, particularly concerning the raising of limits after two years. Political accountability is emphasized, as is the importance of the verbatim record in confirming these agreements. Furthermore, the platform is being utilized to sharply criticize the style and conduct of opponents (Eesti 200). The political framework is a blend of procedural oversight and a value-based appeal (work, livelihood).

The political focus is directed at issues concerning the Riigikogu’s internal rules and procedures, particularly regarding alleged insults made by other members. The speaker takes a personal stance, denying that Jürgen Ligi insulted him, thereby focusing on the parliament’s rules of conduct. The position taken is primarily procedural and serves to clarify these behavioral norms.

The political position centers on the organization of parliamentary work and the speed at which draft legislation is processed. The speaker highlights the unusually rapid movement of the EKRE faction's bill from the Foreign Affairs Committee to the main chamber, expressing slight surprise and pointing to a procedural anomaly. This position is primarily procedural and focuses on the transparency of parliamentary activity.

Politically, the speaker strongly supports designating the Moscow Patriarchate as an institution backing the Russian Federation's military aggression. Furthermore, he advocates lowering the voting age to 16, linking this to the condition that full criminal responsibility under the penal code should also accompany that same age. These positions are strongly value-driven concerning security and the balance between rights and responsibilities.

The most prominent position is a strong, value-based opposition to Soviet symbols ("red symbolism," "idol") and the demand for their swift relocation from the cemetery to a museum to serve as a reminder of the horrific past. This stance is resolute and supports remembering history, not sweeping the past away. It sharply criticizes the idea that a red monument could represent societal cohesion, deeming the notion ridiculous. Furthermore, it briefly touches upon the topic of regulations, citing the prohibition of smokers as an example.