Agenda Profile: Juku-Kalle Raid
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is strongly focused on declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an institution that supports the military aggression of the Russian Federation. It is emphasized that this measure targets the institution, not individual Orthodox believers, which points to a value-based and precise political framework. Furthermore, significant emphasis is placed on the efficiency and acceleration of the Riigikogu (Parliament) session procedure.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The expertise is demonstrated by quoting the title of the agenda item verbatim and explaining its precise content, while distinguishing between the institution and the adherents. This indicates knowledge of the exact wording of the legislative text and of procedural correctness. Awareness is also demonstrated regarding the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and their previous violations.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is direct, substantive, and argumentative, employing criticism aimed at opponents and raising procedural questions to expedite the session. A tone expressing astonishment is used when criticizing the conduct of Isamaa and EKRE. The appeal is primarily logical, focusing on clarifying facts and procedure.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity indicates active participation in the debates of the Riigikogu session, focusing on expediting the procedure and moving to the agenda item. The speaker intervenes with procedural questions to direct the sitting forward. Other frequencies or external activities are not visible in the data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are Isamaa and EKRE, who are facing sharp criticism—and astonishment—for coming to the defense of the Moscow Patriarchate. The criticism is politically charged and highlights the inconsistency in the opponents' values, given that these are parties that brand themselves as national conservative. The backlash is intense and reflects deep disappointment over their conduct.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is evident in the mention of the colleague (Toomas Uibo), referring to previous discussions or a shared memory of procedural violations. The primary objective is to achieve efficiency in the session, rather than inter-party compromise. Data concerning broad-based cooperation is absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Attention is directed toward international and national security issues concerning the institution's support for the Russian Federation’s aggression. There is no regional or local focus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among the social issues addressed are the role of religious institutions and the need to distinguish them from individual believers, stressing that the draft bill does not declare Orthodox believers to be supporters of military action. This demonstrates an awareness of the boundaries between religious freedom and security concerns, as well as the necessity of avoiding the stigmatization of the religious community.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on draft law 420 AE, which aims to declare the Moscow Patriarchate an institution supporting aggression. The speaker is a strong proponent of the bill and is focused on accelerating the session's proceedings, demanding that the acceptance of questions be terminated.
1 Speeches Analyzed