By Plenary Sessions: Henn Põlluaas

The rhetorical style is questioning and analytical, expressing confusion and criticism toward the logic of political decisions. The tone is professional and focuses on highlighting political contradictions, such as the question of why lowering the VAT fails to stimulate the economy.

The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and emotionally charged, using the word "appalling" to describe the government's position. Both statistical data (57%) and emotional appeal are employed, detailing the difficulties people face living from paycheck to paycheck. Finally, sarcasm is used to criticize the government's recommendation ("eat carrots").

The rhetorical style is very sharp, demanding, and highly confrontational, especially regarding the minister's evasion of answers. The speaker uses strong emotional language, accusing the minister of mocking members of the Riigikogu and of sheer ignorance. A substantive and relevant answer is consistently demanded, not "blowing smoke" or discussing irrelevant topics (such as ERSO).

The speaker employs a highly confrontational and accusatory style, utilizing phrases such as "pure demagoguery" and direct questions like, "Why are you lying here?" At the same time, they demand that the discussion remain strictly fact-based, bolstering their logical argument by citing an official source. The overall tone is intense and straightforward.