Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-03-20
Political Position
The most striking themes are ensuring the vitality of the border region and the sharp criticism directed at the government's economic management and social policy (specifically, discrimination against women). The speaker demands that the government locate funds to support border areas and stimulate the economy. These positions are strongly antagonistic toward the government's actions, particularly those of the Reform Party, with the focus resting on the inefficiency and conduct of the administration.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding border control and community vitality, specifically referencing the 2023 study conducted by the University of Tartu's Centre for Applied Social Sciences. Furthermore, they are knowledgeable about the fiscal aspects of the legislation, requiring a numerical breakdown of the budgetary costs for initiatives originating from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is predominantly interrogative, confrontational, and sharply critical, including an ironic element, referring to "a small comical element." The speaker employs both logical appeals (demanding figures and practical examples) and emotional accusations, charging the opposing side with discrimination and displacement activity.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All speeches originate from the same plenary session (2025-03-20) and were presented to the rapporteur as questions or comments. This indicates active participation in the Riigikogu debates, focusing on issues concerning the content and cost of the draft legislation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, which is accused of discriminating against female colleagues and of hypocrisy regarding social policy issues. The criticism is intense and focuses on conduct, accusing the government of engaging in substitute activities instead of managing the economy. The motives of the opposing side are being questioned ("Are you trying to save face?").
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
No data is available. All statements have been presented as questions or opposing viewpoints, suggesting an oppositional attitude rather than a willingness to cooperate.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A strong focus is placed on the problems of the border zone, including the fading away of life and deficiencies in mobile and internet connectivity. Resources are being demanded from the government to ensure the continuation of life in the border zone, thus emphasizing the vitality of peripheral areas.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker is fiscally prudent, demanding to know the exact cost of proposed legislation to the budget. They criticize the government for poor economic management and deem certain initiatives ineffective, highlighting the danger of bureaucracy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The issue of discrimination against women is being raised, with accusations leveled against the Reform Party for disparaging their female colleagues. Skepticism is expressed about joining the international document intended to reduce discrimination, with critics viewing it instead as a bureaucratic substitute activity that only creates more red tape.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is an active opponent and questioner regarding proposed legislation, demanding clarification of the practical benefits and budgetary costs of the initiatives. He/She opposes initiatives that lead to excessive bureaucracy or are considered irrelevant busywork instead of actual economic management.
3 Speeches Analyzed