Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
2024-09-11
Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's actions regarding the confiscation of the replica of the Lihula monument. The speaker positions himself as a defender of constitutional rights, emphasizing a value-based opposition to the arbitrary exercise of state power. He argues that the confiscation violated property rights, the presumption of innocence, and freedom of expression.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of constitutional law, citing Section 13, Subsection 2 of the Constitution, which addresses protection against the arbitrary exercise of state power. He/She also possesses detailed knowledge regarding the locations and status of the copy of the Lihula monument (Lihula private property, Lagedi Museum of the Fight for Freedom).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of discourse is critical, accusatory, and interrogative, employing strong terms such as "arbitrariness" and "display of full authority." The appeal is a blend of legal referencing (the Constitution) and a political attack against the government's decision-making procedures. The tone is demanding and suspicious, particularly regarding upcoming confiscation plans.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data is available for only two questions asked during the Riigikogu information session, which indicates activity in the oversight of the executive branch's operations. Data is lacking regarding broader activity patterns (meetings, travel, frequency of public appearances).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the Government, who are being criticized for the decisions and procedures surrounding the confiscation of the Lihula monument. The criticism is intense and focuses on the unlawfulness of the government's actions and the potential for constitutional breaches. The speaker suggests that the government was aiming to demonstrate the full extent of its power.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no information regarding cooperation or a willingness to compromise. The speaker’s style is direct and confrontational, raising questions about the legitimacy of the government’s actions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on specific geographical locations (Lihula, Lagedi) linked to a historical memorial. Although the issue is local, it is being addressed at the national level within the context of constitutional rights violations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
No data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Strong emphasis is placed on civil liberties, especially property rights, the presumption of innocence, and freedom of expression. The topic is linked to historical memory (the struggle for freedom) and the limits of state authority, accusing the government of arbitrary treatment.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the executive actions of the government and the oversight of their constitutionality, rather than initiating or amending new laws. The speaker demands clarification regarding the government's decision-making process and its legal basis.
2 Speeches Analyzed