Session Profile: Evelin Poolamets
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
2024-06-03
Political Position
The political position centers on strong criticism of the actions taken by the government and its ministers, particularly concerning ethical issues and business lobbying (Bolt, Oleg Ossinovski). The criticism targets both the government's internal instability (the prime minister's threats) and the financing of the political party linked to corruption suspicions. Furthermore, the position supports a clear international stance regarding the non-recognition of the results of the Russian presidential elections.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the government's internal affairs, the structure of the ministry (the role of the Undersecretary), and the mechanisms governing party financing and lobbying. They are also aware of international political procedures related to the non-recognition of elections, and specific reference is made to the actions taken by the Latvian Prosecutor's Office.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and question-driven, utilizing facts known from the media (e.g., the Bolt directive, Ossinovski's corruption suspicions) to pressure the opponent. The goal is to expose ethical inconsistency and the government's internal weakness by posing direct questions regarding lobbying and favors.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active during the plenary session, participating in the no-confidence debate and posing clarifying questions both to the minister and to the rapporteur of the draft resolution. This pattern of activity points to active involvement in scrutinizing the government’s actions and discussing legislative proposals.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed specifically at the minister facing the no-confidence vote and indirectly at the Prime Minister (due to threats). The criticism is intense and focuses on ethical violations, the party's funding ties to individuals suspected of corruption, and the use of ministry lobbyists (Sandra Särav). No willingness to compromise is evident.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is divided between national (ministry lobbying, political party financing, and government stability) and international topics. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of non-recognition of the Russian elections, and reference is made to the corruption proceedings initiated by the Latvian Prosecutor's Office.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective involves strong criticism of the links between business lobbying and political party financing, particularly concerning the cases involving Bolt and Oleg Ossinovski. The speaker objects to the use of lobbyists paid by the state to represent the commercial interests of specific companies within government ministries.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently directed at a specific draft resolution concerning the non-recognition of the results of the presidential elections in the Russian Federation. The speaker is asking the government about the crucial next steps that should be taken upon the adoption of the draft, demonstrating interest in the practical implementation of the resolution.
4 Speeches Analyzed