Agenda Profile: Evelin Poolamets
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Penal Code and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Increasing the Fine Unit) (Bill 415 SE)
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Political Position
The political position is skeptical regarding the proposed amendments to the Penal Code concerning the increase of the fine unit. The primary emphasis is placed on a procedural deficiency, specifically that the draft bill lacks an impact assessment, which calls into question the justification of the proposed fine amounts. This position is firmly rooted in both policy and procedural concerns.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of legislative procedures, stressing the need for an impact assessment when imposing financial penalties. The expert analysis focuses on the methodology of lawmaking and whether the fine amounts are determined based on sound justification or merely "on a gut feeling."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is direct and critical, posing sharp questions to the Minister regarding the bill's methodology. A logical appeal is employed, contrasting decisions based on the missing impact analysis with the supposed "gut feeling." The tone is formal and focuses on the absence of data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the data presented, participation in the first reading of the draft amendment to the Penal Code is evident. The pattern of activity indicates active involvement in the legislative process through the submission of questions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed at the bill's presenter (the minister), sharply criticizing the procedural deficiencies in the preparation of the draft legislation. The criticism focuses on the quality of the policy and the procedure, not on individuals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient information
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is entirely on national legislation and amendments to the Penal Code concerning the size of the penalty unit.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives relate to the imposition of state financial penalties (fines), stressing the need for data-driven justification. This indicates a preference for fiscal discipline and transparency when implementing state financial measures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The discussion of social issues covers the financial aspect of penal policy (fines), with a focus on the administrative and methodological accuracy of the draft legislation. Emphasis is placed on observing the principles of the rule of law when determining punishments.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on the critical review of the Draft Act Amending the Penal Code (415 SE) and challenging the methodology used therein. The speaker is critical of the bill's quality and stresses the importance of meeting legislative quality standards.
1 Speeches Analyzed