Agenda Profile: Evelin Poolamets

First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

2025-04-21

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Political Position
The political focus is on the draft resolution (576 OE) concerning the formation of an investigative committee into the security of e-elections. The speaker adopts a strongly critical position, expressing personal astonishment regarding the ignorance and attitude displayed by the representatives of the Electoral Commission. This stance is rather outcome-oriented and centers on the inappropriate conduct of public service representatives.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates procedural awareness by referring to their participation in the Constitutional Committee during the discussion of the draft bill. The expertise involves the work of the committee and the critical assessment of the presentation and attitude of the representatives of the Electoral Commission who appeared there.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and emotionally charged, expressing personal astonishment regarding the conduct of the representatives of the Election Commission. A direct address to a colleague and a rhetorical question are employed to emphasize the shared negative impression and seek validation.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The representative is actively participating in the Riigikogu sitting and takes part in the work of the Constitutional Committee, where the draft resolution for the investigative committee was discussed. His/her pattern of activity includes active participation in the committee debates and reporting those results back to the chamber.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the representatives of the Electoral Commission, who are being accused of ignorance and inappropriate conduct while serving on the commission. The criticism is intense and focuses on their behavioral and procedural deficiencies, rather than their political standpoints.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker addresses the colleague directly—with whom they work on the Constitutional Committee—seeking confirmation and sharing a negative impression. This suggests collaboration with like-minded colleagues within the committee to strengthen the critical narrative.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient Data

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the Riigikogu's draft resolution (576 OE) concerning the formation of an investigative committee to address the security of e-elections. The speaker is an active participant in the discussions surrounding this draft resolution within the Constitutional Committee, apparently supporting the establishment of the investigative committee.

1 Speeches Analyzed