Agenda Profile: Evelin Poolamets

Inquiry regarding energy supply reliability (no. 717)

2025-04-14

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Political Position
The political focus is strongly centered on energy supply security and the protection of national interests. The speaker strongly opposes ideological green goals that jeopardize stability, and demands the prioritization of domestic dispatchable capacities (including keeping oil shale power plants in reserve and developing nuclear energy). This stance is clearly aimed at ensuring self-sufficiency and reducing reliance on external suppliers.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise on the topic of energy supply security and generation capacity. Technical terms are used (dispatchable capacity, 1000 megawatts per hour), and the specific characteristics of energy sources (gas, oil shale, nuclear) are differentiated. The argumentation is supported by referencing the position of the head of Eesti Energia regarding the need for dispatchable energy.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, insistent, and logic-driven, emphasizing practical necessity (electricity for hospitals, schools) over ideological slogans. Sharp contrasts and rhetorical questions are employed to highlight self-evident truths, such as renewable energy's dependence on the weather.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is limited to submitting a formal query (interpellation) to the minister in the Riigikogu, which signals active parliamentary scrutiny of the government's energy policy. Both addresses took place during the same sitting.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is aimed at the government’s energy ideology and green goals, which jeopardize the security of supply. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing that imported gas and unstable renewable energy do not guarantee independence. Opponents are accused of dismantling national interests using ideological slogans.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is confrontational, yet the speaker attempts to establish common ground with the minister concerning the necessity of dispatchable capacity. Simultaneously, the solutions proposed by the minister (the preference for gas power plants) are immediately criticized as both insufficient and dependence-creating.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly at the national level, centering on Estonia's energy security and domestic production capacities. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of preserving domestic resources, particularly oil shale, as the only independent source.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives emphasize the availability of stable energy for industry and criticize the high subsidy requirements of the proposed wind farms. This points to a preference for solutions that are economically more self-sufficient and less reliant on taxpayer funds.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Social issues are linked to energy security, emphasizing that a stable electricity supply is essential for the functioning of schools, hospitals, and industry. This demonstrates concern over the disruption of public services and vital functions.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is centered on strategic energy policy, mandating the maintenance of existing dispatchable capacity (oil shale power plants) in reserve and the development of new capacity (a nuclear power plant). The objective is to guarantee security of supply and minimize reliance on external factors.

2 Speeches Analyzed