Agenda Profile: Evelin Poolamets
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
Political Position
The political position heavily focuses on casting doubt on the opponent's personal credibility and the consistency of their stated values. Issues regarding travel to Russia and changing political parties are brought to the forefront, suggesting concerns about national loyalty and political stability. These stances are strongly value-based and are aimed at evaluating the minister's actions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is direct and formal, employing pointed questions to challenge the opponent's personal credibility and the consistency of their values. The tone is critical and challenging, focusing more on personal and value-based attacks (party switching, visits to Russia) than on substantive policy arguments.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of action is limited to asking two questions during the debate on the motion of no confidence at the Riigikogu session.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed directly at the minister facing the no-confidence motion, with the criticism being intensely personal and value-driven. Emphasis is placed on the opponent's switch of political parties and a potential shift in their core values. Furthermore, sensitive questions are being raised regarding visits to Russia, suggesting doubts about the minister's loyalty.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national level (the minister's credibility) and the international level (visits to Russia); there are no references to specific regional topics.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among social issues, the topic of same-sex marriage is being emphasized, and the opponent is being challenged regarding the consistency of their core values. This point refers to criticism concerning the opponent's potentially opportunistic shift in position following a change of political affiliation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on holding the minister accountable through the motion of no confidence, rather than initiating or supporting specific pieces of legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed