Session Profile: Anti Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-04-21
Political Position
The political position is heavily focused on the reliability and security of the electoral process, particularly concerning e-voting. The speaker sharply criticizes the current system, citing potential fraud ("double bottom") and the anomaly surrounding the Reform Party's electronic votes. The stance is procedure-based, urgently demanding the preservation of evidence to prevent its swift destruction.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of e-voting security and legal procedures, referencing Märt Põder's article, the results of a master's thesis, and a diagram. Technical and legal terms are utilized, such as "double bottom" and "preservation of evidence." The depth of this knowledge is further supported by a historical parallel drawn with the VEB Fund commission, emphasizing the long-term nature of the investigation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical, serious, and skeptical, focusing on logical arguments and references to external analysis. The speaker utilizes historical parallels (the VEB Fund) and raises a specific procedural question, stressing the need to preserve both the consequences and the evidence. The tone is formal and centered on facts, rather than emotions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the data, the pattern of activity is limited to asking the rapporteur a question during the plenary session regarding the credibility of the elections. The address took place in April 2025 and focused on the topic of establishing an investigative committee.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the procedures governing the organization of elections, which allow for the destruction of evidence, and indirectly at the Reform Party, in whose e-votes a "complete anomaly" was identified according to the diagram. The criticism is procedural and intense, calling into question the reliability of the system and the legitimacy of past election results.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Data regarding the style of cooperation is unavailable, as the address is confined to posing a critical question to the presenter concerning the establishment of an investigation committee and the preservation of evidence. There is no reference to cross-party collaboration or a willingness to compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is entirely on the national level, addressing the procedures and trustworthiness of Estonian elections.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is aimed at ensuring the integrity of elections and procedural reform. The speaker supports the establishment of an investigative commission and calls for amending the law to ensure the preservation of electronic evidence, thereby preventing its rapid destruction.
1 Speeches Analyzed