Session Profile: Anti Poolamets
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-04-08
Political Position
The political position centers on strong opposition to the use of the concept of social gender (gender) in legislative drafts, demanding the clear definition of traditional sexes (male and female). The speaker criticizes the government for aggressive ideological promotion and frames their stance through conservative values. The dispute over the bill's terminology is value-based and intensely confrontational.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of gender identity and terminology, referencing international conventions and the English terms "gender" and "sex." A specific claim is also presented regarding the content of the Estonian education system, mentioning 20 social genders in 8th-grade textbooks. Expertise is utilized to highlight the consequences of the opposing side's policies.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly confrontational and accusatory, employing emotional appeals ("Put your hand on your heart now") and direct challenges aimed at the opposition. Irony and colloquial expressions are utilized (e.g., "Now eat the [porridge] you've cooked up here") to criticize the adversary's policies and perceived lack of conviction. The speaker attempts to ridicule the opponent by suggesting they are talking "muddled nonsense."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is directed against the governing coalition and a specific political party, who are being criticized for supporting and signing a convention that includes the concept of social gender. The criticism is intense and ideological, accusing opponents of aggressive ideological promotion and incompetence. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the demand is for the government to accept the consequences of the mistakes it has made.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is split between national issues (Estonian legislation and education) and international topics, citing the situation in the US and an international convention. Specific local regions are not emphasized.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
At the core of social debates is fierce opposition to the broader definition of gender identity, particularly the recognition of social gender and transgender status in legislation. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of defending the biological definition of man and woman and criticizes the opposing side's actions within the education system. The entire issue is framed as a moral and values conflict.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on disputing the text and terminology of a specific draft bill, particularly concerning the use of the term "underrepresented sex/gender." The speaker, acting as the opposition, is demanding clarification on whether the term refers to biological or social sex. The ultimate objective is to prevent the creation of rights for so-called "other genders" via this proposed legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed