Session Profile: Anti Poolamets
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-10
Political Position
The political position focuses strongly on the crisis of democracy and state legitimacy, highlighting the growing distrust towards the government and elections. Furthermore, the speaker urgently calls on the government to take concrete steps to improve the nation's defense capabilities (anti-drone systems and surveillance) following a dangerous incident. The stance is strongly oppositional and centers on the failure of the government's actions (or inaction).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the technical aspects of national defense, referencing improvements in drone and surveillance capabilities, and noting that a significant sum has been earmarked for this in the Ministry of Defense budgets. They also utilize public opinion data, pointing out that over 40% of people do not trust elections and that this percentage is rising according to repeated surveys.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharply critical, accusatory, and forceful, expressing disappointment with the Prime Minister's responses. The speaker employs strong emotional and moral judgments (e.g., "cynically steamrolling," "crisis of democracy") while simultaneously demanding concrete and precise information from the government regarding the actual improvement in capability.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The patterns of activity show active participation in the plenary session in November 2025, posing critical questions regarding both the crisis of confidence and national defense.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary target is the government and the prime minister, who face sharp criticism for their cynicism, ignoring the crisis of public trust, and inadequate national defense. The criticism is intense, spanning from mere political failure to a fundamental question of legitimacy, suggesting the need for snap elections. The speaker faults the prime minister for being vague and focusing on the root causes (Russia) instead of offering concrete solutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on domestic issues (the crisis of democracy, state legitimacy) and international security, with Russia cited as the root cause. In the context of the crisis of confidence, comparisons are drawn with foreign countries currently holding snap elections.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The social issue discussed is the public's lack of trust in elections and the government, which the speaker considers a widespread crisis of democracy. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on the endangering of human lives through a drone incident, an issue directly related to security and social safety.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
There is no legislative focus; the speaker is concentrating on scrutinizing the government's actions and demanding the more effective deployment of existing defense budget resources to enhance drone capabilities.
2 Speeches Analyzed