Session Profile: Anti Poolamets
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
2024-10-09
Political Position
The political focus is heavily directed towards issues of demography and family policy, emphasizing the value placed on large families and the increase of family benefits. The speaker expresses strong opposition to the government's decision to revoke the previous cross-party consensus concerning the increase in benefits. The political framework is strongly value-based, stressing the need to support families who made decisions based on earlier promises.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the previous work of the Commission on the Population Crisis and the development of the family benefits policy. Particular emphasis is placed on understanding the political agreements and their social impact, referencing families who began having children based on the promise. The specific term "cross-party consensus" is used to describe the outcome achieved prior to the last elections.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is critical and concerned, utilizing rhetorical questions to express frustration and skepticism regarding policy changes. The speaker employs strong emotional appeals and concrete examples (such as Siim Kallas's derisive remark) to sharply criticize the societal attitude. The tone is rather combative, emphasizing the value of a previous achievement (consensus) and the negative impact of its dismissal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's move to cancel family benefits, which had previously garnered cross-party support. Furthermore, Siim Kallas is being sharply criticized for his personal attitude, which is seen as mocking large families and is considered offensive to public sensibilities. The criticism is intense and addresses both political decisions and underlying values.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the value of cross-party cooperation and consensus, citing as a positive example the previous agreement to increase family benefits—an issue they equate in importance to national defense. Disappointment is now expressed that the government’s first action was to unilaterally scrap this powerful cross-party achievement.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives focus on the significance of state social benefits (family benefits), strongly advocating for their increase to achieve demographic objectives. The speaker emphasizes that raising family benefits is a crucial measure that directly influences family behavior and planning.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue revolves around supporting large families and ensuring they are valued within society. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of fostering a positive attitude and sharply criticizes public ridicule, which obstructs the proper appreciation of these families. Social policy is intrinsically linked to resolving the demographic crisis.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is the reinstatement of the bill or decision concerning the raising of family benefits, which had garnered cross-party support before the election. The speaker currently opposes the government's annulment of the previous agreement and inquires about the prospect of returning to that agreement.
2 Speeches Analyzed