Session Profile: Anti Poolamets

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

2024-01-15

Political Position
The most prominent issues are corruption related to aid for Ukraine, opposition to Rail Baltic, and population policy. The political stance is sharply critical of the government and the prime minister, focusing on both value-based criticism (defending the constitution, sovereignty) and performance-based criticism (slow investigations, ineffective projects). It stresses the need for financial subsidies to boost the birth rate, directly contradicting the prime minister's position.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates specific knowledge regarding Rail Baltic logistics, cost (referencing Latvian estimates), and environmental impact (gravel resources in Pärnu County). They utilize demographic data, referencing the views of demographer Allan Puur concerning the impact of the third child benefit. They show awareness of security procedures, referencing the whistleblower protection directive and the constitutional deadlines for responding to interpellations.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is largely confrontational, emotional, and urgent, particularly when addressing issues of corruption and security. It employs strong language and accusations ("outrageous act," "betrayed Ukraine"). Arguments are supported by personal experiences (a train journey, a village incident, a personal court case example) and anecdotes, which are then balanced with factual data and expert opinions.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively performs parliamentary oversight, utilizing inquiries and questions directed at ministers. They mention a recent meeting with the Latvian Parliament's friendship group in Valga, which demonstrates activity in international and regional contacts. They also refer to personal experiments (traveling by train) conducted to test demand.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the Prime Minister, the Minister of the Interior, and the coalition, who stand accused of violating the constitution and betraying Ukraine. Criticism is also directed at security agencies (Kapo, the Prosecutor's Office), which are suspected of political bias and attempting to seize power (the "deep state concept"). The intensity of the attacks is high, and no willingness to compromise is evident.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Information regarding the willingness to cooperate is lacking; the speeches focus on harsh criticism directed at the government and institutions. Cooperation with those assisting Ukraine outside the Riigikogu (Raivo Olev) is mentioned, but not internally within the parliament itself.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A strong regional focus is placed on Southern Estonia (Tartu, Valga) and the cross-border transport connection with Latvia (Riga). It highlights the negative impact of Rail Baltic on Pärnu County and advocates for developing the existing railway route to serve regional policy goals. Security concerns in Lääne-Viru County are also mentioned.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports financial subsidies aimed at increasing the birth rate, citing the previous positive impact (the third child benefit). It is critical of the Rail Baltic billion-euro project, arguing that it is too expensive, inefficient, and suffers from low demand, preferring instead the sensible development of existing infrastructure.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Focuses on the topics of education and security. It demands that Ukrainian children study in the Ukrainian language and follow Ukrainian curricula to ensure their successful return to their homeland. It expresses concern regarding uncontrolled immigration and the associated security risks (such as thefts and hostile individuals), calling for improved background checks and access to criminal records.

11 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is oversight and ensuring constitutionality, requiring the government to provide swift and honest responses to parliamentary inquiries. Also prioritized is the monitoring of the activities of security agencies and strengthening the protection of parliamentary immunity against political pressure.

11 Speeches Analyzed