Agenda Profile: Anti Poolamets

Interpellation concerning the abuse of power by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) in connection with the unlawful suppression of freedom of speech and expression (No. 620)

2024-04-02

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Political Position
The political focus is directed toward the removal of symbols of Soviet-era crimes (monuments to those who carried out the deportations) and the restoration of historical justice. The speaker strongly and value-basedly demands that the government enforce the laws, stressing that the current situation is comparable to the Soviet period. The stance is highly confrontational and centers on the government's inaction.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of recent Estonian history, especially regarding the Soviet period and the topic of deportees, and leverages this knowledge to criticize opponents. Also evident is an awareness of the laws concerning prohibited monuments and the failure to enforce them.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly confrontational, accusatory, and urgent. The speaker employs sharp questions and personal attacks aimed at the opponents' historical awareness, accusing them of sneering and ignorance. The appeal is primarily moral and emotional, emphasizing historical injustice.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data regarding activity patterns (frequency, rhythm, meetings) is insufficient, with the exception that the address was delivered during a sitting of the Riigikogu as part of an interpellation.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is aimed at the government and its representatives, who are sharply criticized for their historical ignorance and their failure to remove monuments dedicated to the perpetrators of the deportations. The criticism is both personal and moral, accusing the opponents of sneering at those who expose historical crimes.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no evidence of any willingness to cooperate or compromise; the tone is purely confrontational and demanding.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly national and ideological, centering on the historical memory of the Republic of Estonia and the enforcement of laws at the state level. There are no references to local or international issues.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is no data available regarding economic positions.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is historical justice and national memory, linked to the existence of monuments dedicated to the perpetrators of communist crimes. The speaker demands the removal of symbols that honor the destroyers of the Estonian people, prioritizing historical truth and respect for the victims.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently aimed at demanding the enforcement of laws that have already been passed—specifically those dealing with the removal of monuments dedicated to perpetrators of deportations and communist criminals. The speaker is calling for implementation, rather than proposing new legislation, and is criticizing the government's failure to enforce existing laws.

1 Speeches Analyzed