Agenda Profile: Anti Poolamets
Inquiry regarding the promotion of gender equality and equal treatment in private and family life (No. 268)
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker strongly opposes the promotion of gender neutrality in the public sphere, citing Finland's expensive modification of traffic signs as an example. Furthermore, they advocate for strict protection for women, supporting a ban on face coverings and referencing the French model. Their position is value-driven, centered on safeguarding women from extremists and critically examining the necessity of gender-neutral initiatives.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of international social policy, highlighting France's strict measures concerning face covering and Finland's 2020 law on gender-neutral traffic signs. They emphasize the financial cost associated with the issue, which suggests a certain level of detailed knowledge in comparative law and politics.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and direct, leveling strong accusations at the opponent, claiming they are defending "extremists who actually push women into a corner." The speaker presents their views in the form of questions, drawing on both international examples and logical (cost-based) arguments.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The available data indicates only one instance of participation during a parliamentary inquiry, demonstrating activity related to gender equality and equal treatment issues in the Riigikogu.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is aimed at the minister or the government, who stand accused of protecting "extremists" and supporting the marginalization of women. The criticism is intense and value-driven, calling into question the opposing side's moral compass.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly international, using socio-political solutions from France and Finland as comparative material (the ban on face coverings and gender-neutral traffic signs). There is no reference to local or Estonia-internal regional issues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker voiced concerns regarding public expenditures tied to gender-neutral initiatives, specifically citing the significant financial outlay required to change traffic signs in Finland as an example. This indicates a skeptical approach to funding socio-political objectives when they prove to be costly.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Regarding social issues, the speaker focuses on opposing gender-neutral concepts and policies, and advocates for the strict protection of women. He/She demands a ban on face coverings, referring to it as a practice that subjugates women.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on scrutinizing the government's activities through inquiries, specifically concerning the promotion of gender equality and equal treatment. The speaker acts as the initiator, posing precise questions regarding gender terminology and potential new regulations (e.g., a ban on face coverings).
1 Speeches Analyzed