Agenda Profile: Siim Pohlak
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political position is strongly aimed against the current structure of e-voting, emphasizing the risk of violating the core principle of election law: "one voter, one vote." This stance is driven by concerns regarding the integrity and legality of the electoral process, highlighting specific violations, such as the misuse of the ID card. The focus is primarily on the procedural and legal framework rather than a values-based debate.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of electoral law, specifically citing Section 1, Subsection 3 of the Riigikogu Election Act. The expertise focuses on presenting scenarios involving practical security vulnerabilities and legal violations related to e-voting, using as an example a situation where one person casts a vote on behalf of another. Information is also sought regarding previous decisions made by courts or the election commission in disputes concerning the casting of multiple votes.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the respected chairman and the rapporteur. The speaker combines a legal reference (a section of the law) with an anecdotal example (the elderly woman and her daughter) to illustrate the system's vulnerability. The objective is to present logical challenges and demand evidence-based responses concerning instances of electoral fraud.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is no data on the frequency of these appearances, but the speaker refers to earlier activity during elections, specifically being out with a tent and engaging with voters. The current pattern of activity involves submitting questions during Riigikogu sessions to gain clarity regarding violations of the law.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed squarely at the e-voting system, criticizing its security and legality because it facilitates a direct violation of the election law. The criticism is procedural and intense, as examples are being highlighted that point to the threat of systemic fraud. The election commission or the courts are also indirectly criticized by questioning their previous stances regarding cases of multiple voting.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is no data regarding willingness to cooperate or compromise. The speaker acts as an interrogator, challenging the presenter and demanding explanations.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is strictly national, covering the Riigikogu Election Act and the nationwide e-voting procedure. Specific regional interests or topics are not addressed.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is no data on economic standpoints.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among the social issues addressed are the fairness and security of elections, highlighting an example of how e-voting can create situations where the votes of vulnerable groups (e.g., an elderly woman) are exploited. The focus is on guaranteeing the protection of civil rights throughout the electoral process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on either improving or suspending the electoral law and the procedure for e-voting (depending on the context of the draft bill). The speaker is acting as a critical interrogator, searching for evidence of legal violations that would support the necessity of e-voting reform.
1 Speeches Analyzed