By Plenary Sessions: Õnne Pillak

The speaker's rhetorical style is predominantly factual and analytical, focusing on facts and procedural steps. The tone is defensively optimistic, emphasizing the positive steps taken, but acknowledging the need for thorough analysis. He uses logical arguments, contrasting complex solutions with simple ones (e.g., "let's raise one benefit"), and adds emotional appeals regarding the importance of security and attitude.

The rhetorical style is formal, informative, and procedural, fitting the role of the rapporteur for the steering committee. The tone is neutral and analytical, focusing on accurately summarizing the committee's discussion, the minister's explanations, and the procedural decisions. Logical and fact-based arguments are employed, avoiding emotional appeals.

The style is polite and inquisitive, starting by thanking the presenter and acknowledging that the question differs slightly from the topic discussed so far. The appeals are balanced, relying on both logical arguments (TAI data) and emotional/practical feedback (parents' concerns).