Session Profile: Heljo Pikhof

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

2024-03-20

Political Position
The political stance is strongly supportive of improving the social guarantees for professionals in the cultural sector and increasing the flexibility of funding for state cultural institutions. The statement emphasizes the profound importance of preserving culture and language in the maintenance of the state, lending the position a strong value-based framework. The speaker confirms the Social Democrats' support for the draft legislation, which resolves a long-standing issue.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough expertise regarding social protection and funding in the cultural sector, explaining the details of the Cultural Endowment's (Kultuurkapital) new creative salary system and its impact on taxation. Technical terms are utilized (e.g., gambling tax, rolling health insurance), and reference is made to the 2021 study by the Praxis Think Tank concerning the situation of freelance creative professionals. A specific assessment is presented, estimating that the change would positively affect approximately 5,000 individuals working in the cultural field.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of the speech is formal and informative, focusing on the detailed explanation of the legal amendments and their positive impact on the social safety net for creative professionals. The tone is optimistic regarding the solution that has been achieved, but simultaneously emphasizes the need for further steps (e.g., rolling health insurance). The argumentation is strongly logical, relying on research and the explanation of financial mechanisms.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker refers to long-standing activities and discussions that have spanned years, involving countless meetings, the writing of articles, and the commissioning of studies concerning the status of creative professionals. The draft bill was initiated last autumn, demonstrating active participation in the legislative process.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speech avoids mentioning opposing parties or leveling criticism at other political forces. Instead, the focus is on resolving a systemic issue that has been a major talking point for years.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is consensual, emphasizing the need for support from the Minister of Culture, the Cultural Committee, and the Council of the Cultural Endowment for the successful implementation of the legislative amendments. It is noted that the initiation of the draft bill was encouraged by the additional funds received, which indicates the indirect support provided by the government's tax policy.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively on national issues, addressing the financing of the national broadcaster's building and nationwide social guarantees for freelance creative professionals.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic viewpoints support the use of tax increases (excise duties) to improve social protection and emphasize the need to pay creative professionals fair compensation. The objective is to ensure social guarantees and a stable income for workers with irregular earnings, without reducing their net income. State intervention in the creation of a social safety net is supported.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social issue is the lack of social security provisions (health insurance, pension, unemployment insurance) for freelance creative professionals, a problem that has persisted for years. The speaker strongly advocates for improving the social safety net, viewing this as a crucial step in ensuring the financial stability and well-being of creative workers.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on amending the Cultural Endowment Act to establish a creative remuneration system that grants social protection to creative individuals, and to introduce flexibility in the financing of nationally important cultural buildings (including the ERR building). The speaker is a strong proponent and initiator of these amendments (through the Culture Committee).

2 Speeches Analyzed