Agenda Profile: Heljo Pikhof

An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

2025-09-15

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

Political Position
The political stance is highly critical of the government’s inaction and evasion of responsibility regarding the delay in adopting the arms legislation. Administrative failure is emphasized, and there is a demand for the naming of a specific accountable individual, citing the prior pattern of collective responsibility. The focus is on evaluating the government’s performance and fulfillment of its obligations.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the legislative process, specifically focusing on the delay in adopting the Arms Act. Their expertise is evident in their ability to identify a specific legislative bottleneck and the corresponding question of accountability.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, yet sharp and critical, employing the address "Honorable Minister!". A rhetorical question is used (Who is responsible for this?) to emphasize the government's avoidance of responsibility and the blatant nature of the delay. The tone is accusatory and demanding.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data set is too small to identify patterns, but the discussion took place as part of an inquiry, which suggests an active supervisory role.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is leveled against the ministry and the minister, centering on procedural failure (the delay in passing the law) and the diffusion of responsibility. The avoidance of accountability ("the entire administrative area collectively") is viewed as a recurring issue.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is expediting the passing of the Weapons Act. The speaker is acting as a critic, demanding that the government be held accountable for obstructing the legislative process.

1 Speeches Analyzed