By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Mölder

The speaker is actively involved in legislative work, having participated in and delivered reports at two sessions of the Economic Affairs Committee (September 15 and 22). They will present in the plenary session as a co-rapporteur, which demonstrates regular and structured participation in the law-making process. They also refer to upcoming discussions in committees and working groups scheduled between readings.

The data is limited to two questions at one plenary session, which suggests activity during the budget discussion phase. The pattern of question submission is detailed and requires ministry-level involvement in data collection.

The data is limited to a single appearance during the Riigikogu plenary session, which addressed the second reading of the bill. The speaker is an active participant in the debate, posing substantive questions to the minister.

The speaker's pattern of activity is connected to the work of the Riigikogu committee, serving as the representative of the lead committee in the plenary session and having participated in two substantive committee meetings (on April 24 and May 12). Their role is to convey the summary of the committee's discussion and the consensus decisions to the full assembly.

The speaker is active both in committee work and during plenary sessions, referencing earlier committee discussions and immediately responding to arguments raised on the floor. He/She uses their interventions to highlight and affirm the institutions' positions regarding the draft bill.

The course of action was limited to a single, brief intervention during the plenary session, the purpose of which was to correct a historical fact regarding the start of the Tallinn Hospital project.

The records indicate participation in the plenary session, where a question is being posed to the minister regarding the draft law. The speaker has actively engaged with businesses in the sector to gather feedback on the legislative process.

The data is limited to a single appearance at the plenary session of the Riigikogu in November 2024. Insufficient data.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary debate, repeatedly posing detailed questions to the rapporteurs and the committee chair. They mention having had to attend a meeting in the interim, which points to a demanding schedule. The speaker is also familiar with the discussions of the Bureau.

Insufficient information.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, casting a vote (abstaining) and carefully monitoring the presentation of the voting results. This pattern demonstrates vigilance regarding procedural errors during the session.

The data indicates active participation in the Riigikogu Q&A session, where several clarifying questions were posed concerning the activities of the Competition Authority and the analysis of the pharmacy reform. The speaker is persistent in presenting their questions, shifting the focus from criticism of communication to issues of conflict of interest.

The speaker's pattern of activity demonstrates persistence and consistency, highlighting that the query was attempted to be submitted nearly four times before its successful presentation on May 15th. This points to systematic and repeated engagement with specific political topics, demanding answers from the government.

The speaker's pattern of activity involves submitting interpellations to ministers (specifically the Minister of the Interior) and participating in plenary sessions. The submission of an interpellation on May 13th is mentioned, which indicates long-term monitoring of the issue and structured political activity. He/She utilizes the additional time allocated to thoroughly elaborate on his/her arguments.