Agenda Profile: Tõnis Mölder
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position is one of strong support for the draft bill amending the constitution (527 SE), which is described as "extremely good and favorable" and which the speaker himself initiated. The primary objective is to restrict voting rights for certain individuals, but simultaneously, the need to find a reasonable compromise with another similar bill is emphasized. The stance is policy- and value-based, stressing national benefit over political points.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates competence in parliamentary procedure and the legislative process, citing their extensive parliamentary experience and familiarity with legal challenges concerning the promulgation of legislation. They stress the procedural requirements for constitutional amendments, noting their awareness of the deliberations within the Council of Elders and the necessity of achieving broad consensus.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is generally constructive and analytical, but it also contains sharp criticism directed at the political process, accusing the factions of engaging in "political games and theater." Rhetorical questions are employed to cast doubt on the sincerity of the discussion, and emphasis is placed on a logical appeal to the need for national benefit and consensus.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the legislative process, having personally initiated the draft bill under consideration and participating in discussions as a member of the Council of Elders. This pattern of activity indicates a focus on internal parliamentary planning and constitutional debates, underscoring the necessity of a long-term procedural approach.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at the procedural conduct of political factions who are engaging in political gamesmanship and acting purely in self-interest, instead of seeking a broad consensus beneficial to the state. The criticism is not aimed at specific individuals, but rather at the lack of sincerity in the process between the coalition and the opposition.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker strongly emphasizes the necessity of cooperation and openness to compromise in order to find "a reasonable compromise and good wording" for the two similar draft bills. He/She stresses that amending the constitution requires "a very broad consensus" and that the Estonian state, rather than political points, must be the beneficiary.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social topic is the restriction of voting rights for certain individuals in local elections, a measure the speaker supports. He raises the issue of social risk, warning that failure to implement the change by the 2025 deadline could provoke backlash and demonstrations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft act concerning the amendment of the Constitution (527 SE), a bill which the speaker initiated and supports. The priority is the bill's lengthy procedure and achieving a compromise with the second draft bill to ensure the amendment is implemented before the 2025 local elections.
2 Speeches Analyzed