Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-05-07
Political Position
The speaker clearly represents opposition viewpoints, supporting the Centre Party and criticizing government policy. There is strong resistance to tax hikes (VAT, excise duties, electricity tax), emphasizing their negative impact on ordinary citizens and pensioners. The speaker supports amendments to the cybersecurity act but warns against the dangers of bureaucracy and excessive formality. Consistent criticism is leveled at the government’s social policy, particularly concerning the unemployment benefit reform.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong understanding of social policy, particularly the unemployment insurance and subsistence benefits system. Shows competence in the field of cybersecurity, referencing specific legal sections (§38) and technical terminology. In economic and taxation matters, they operate with specific figures (47 million euros in savings, 374-euro compensation) and understand the consequences of budgetary decisions.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
An emotional and dramatic style, utilizing direct address to the audience ("Good people who are watching us!"). It emphasizes themes of human dignity and justice, utilizing rhetorical questions and personal stories regarding the situation of pensioners. It combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, particularly when discussing vulnerable social groups.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Active participation in the plenary session on May 7, 2025, submitting several questions and delivering longer speeches. Consistent questioning of ministers and rapporteurs, seeking specific answers regarding political decisions. It is mentioned that they have not "made a single presentation that would have pleased the Estonian people," referencing regular appearances.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharp criticism of the government and its members, accusing them of lying and implementing unfair tax policies. The Social Democratic Party was singled out for particular criticism regarding the unemployment insurance reform. [The speaker/group] warns against lying becoming a "political norm" and highlights the dangers this poses to democracy. Cooperation is not ruled out, but clear answers and transparency are demanded.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
A constructive approach, supporting the cybersecurity act despite having some reservations. It calls for dialogue and recommends practical solutions (e.g., collaboration with municipal social services departments). It stresses the need for well-considered and proportional legislation, demonstrating a willingness to compromise, provided the right conditions are met.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The text primarily focuses on nationwide issues, though it does mention the unique situation of rural areas regarding electricity grid connection costs. It stresses that residents in rural areas have to pay "even more" for grid connection. Overall, the viewpoint is national, lacking specific regional emphasis.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Clearly left-leaning economic views, supporting progressive taxation and social welfare. Strongly opposes increases to VAT, excise duties, and the electricity tax. Criticizes "backward" economic policy and demands consideration of alternatives, such as a bank tax. Stresses the need to shield low-income individuals and pensioners from the effects of economic decisions.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A strong emphasis on the themes of social justice and human dignity. Defends the rights of the unemployed, pensioners, single mothers, and long-term caregivers. Criticizes policies that increase social inequality and the risk of poverty. Highlights the state's responsibility to care for the most vulnerable groups in society.
10 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on issues concerning social policy and economic legislation. Actively involved in discussions surrounding the unemployment insurance reform, the cybersecurity act, and the electricity market law. Poses detailed questions regarding the impact of legislation and demands precise explanations concerning costs and potential savings. Stresses the necessity of comprehensive impact assessments before any laws are adopted.
10 Speeches Analyzed