Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-04-23
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the amendment to the Emergency Situation Act, stressing the importance of legislative clarity regarding vital services. While acknowledging that the existing law already permits the imposition of necessary requirements, the speaker deems clarity at the statutory level more crucial than regulation through decrees or circulars. Furthermore, the speaker criticizes the handling of the law concerning compensation for reservists, labeling it unfair.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Shows a good understanding of the structure of legislation, referencing specific sections (§38, §37 subsection 2) and their scope. Demonstrates knowledge in the field of cybersecurity and risk management, as well as the issue of the limited number of specialists in Estonia. Understands the complexity of supervisory duties and institutional competence.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs a formal yet accessible style, beginning by thanking veterans to establish an an emotional connection. It balances criticism with constructive suggestions, using rhetorical questions ("where do we draw the line...") to underscore its points. It concludes on a positive note, affirming support for transparency.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The activity is limited to a single speech delivered during the plenary session of the 5th sitting of the 15th Riigikogu on April 23, 2025. There is insufficient data regarding other activity patterns or frequency of occurrence.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The individual moderately criticizes the parliament's decision to forgo a vote on the reservists' compensation law and instead delegate the matter to "a narrow circle of people." They express concern regarding the lack of oversight authority among the relevant agencies, yet maintain a constructive tone, avoiding personal attacks.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The statement emphasizes the Centre Party faction's support for the bill, notwithstanding certain reservations, thereby demonstrating a willingness to compromise. Furthermore, it recognizes veterans across party lines and expresses broad support for increasing legislative transparency.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is insufficient data on regional interests or local issues.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Expresses concern regarding the scarcity of resources available for organizing oversight, noting that they "have neither the money nor the time" to outsource the necessary expertise. It acknowledges the limited number of Estonian specialists and their heavy workload.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It emphasizes the honoring of veterans and the recognition of their contribution to ensuring national well-being. It supports the fair treatment of reservists regarding compensation, referring to this as "the direct and just treatment of people."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on amending the Emergency Situation Act, specifically concerning the regulation of vital services and cybersecurity requirements. It supports increasing legislative clarity and the public's right to understand who is accountable for what. It criticizes the handling of the Reservists' Compensation Act.
1 Speeches Analyzed