Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
2025-04-17
Political Position
The speaker takes a clear stance supporting the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs, forcefully stressing that food is not a luxury, but a fundamental necessity. He criticizes the government's policy, labeling it ideologically driven, and argues that a "right-wing government" should grasp the economic implications of lowering the VAT rate. This position is value-based, centered on family well-being and social concerns.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Displays knowledge of tax policy and European directives, specifically noting that "very many European countries" have reduced VAT on food products. Also demonstrates an understanding of the links between inflation and consumption, and the effects of economic policy on households.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs an emotional and combative tone, combining personal narratives ("every family, every child, every elderly person") with fact-based arguments. The rhetoric is direct and provocative, utilizing questions to undermine the opponent's stance ("Where do you get that...?", "How can one not understand this?"). The overall tone is critical and accusatory toward the government.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All three addresses were delivered on the same day (April 17, 2025) during the plenary session, indicating active involvement in the discussion. This continues the topic raised by colleague Vadim Belobrovtsev, suggesting a coordinated approach to opposition themes.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He/She sharply criticizes the government and its policies, calling them ideologically motivated and completely disconnected from the needs of the people. The government is accused of failing to grasp the consequences of its actions ("does the government even know what it's doing?"). Reference is also made to the Finance Minister's allegedly indifferent attitude toward the economic hardships faced by the public.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It demonstrates cooperation with colleague Vadim Belobrovtsev, continuing the topic he initiated and referencing him by name. This suggests a coordinated approach in opposition activities, but no cooperation with the government is evident.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports lowering the VAT on food items, arguing that this would stimulate the economy, boost consumption, and alleviate inflation. The government's economic policy is criticized as anti-people, and the state's responsibility for the welfare of its citizens is emphasized. Concern is shown regarding inflation and rising prices, specifically their impact on low-income families.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It focuses primarily on socio-economic issues, emphasizing the state’s responsibility for its most vulnerable residents—low-income families, children, and the elderly. It addresses food accessibility as a fundamental issue of social justice.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The text focuses on the regulation of Value Added Tax (VAT) and proposed changes concerning food items. It compares Estonia's approach to the practices in other European countries and criticizes the government's readiness to comply with certain European directives, while ignoring those that would actually benefit the Estonian people.
3 Speeches Analyzed