Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
2025-09-15
Political Position
The speaker adopts a distinctly oppositional stance towards the government's policy, strongly criticizing the slow decision-making process and inadequate funding. He emphasizes the protection of local government rights and demands greater discretion when differentiating the land tax rate. He supports the systematic raising of cultural workers' salaries and the standardization of school meals across the country.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates in-depth knowledge of local government financing, education, and cultural policy. Uses concrete examples, such as the 200-euro rate for subsistence benefits, and refers to specific processes like collective bargaining negotiations. Further demonstrates an understanding of the complexities inherent in the municipal revenue base and tax system.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone used is direct and critical. They start speeches politely with "Thank you, esteemed chairman/minister," but quickly transition to specific issues. They pose sharp questions and employ irony ("You are currently the champion in this regard"). They rely on facts and concrete examples, rather than emotional appeals.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
A comprehensive analysis of operational patterns cannot be performed due to limited data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He/She systematically criticizes the government, particularly due to the slow preparation of analyses and the sluggish decision-making process. The government is also accused of placing local governments in a difficult situation through tax hikes. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, rather than personal, concentrating on specific systemic issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by making constructive proposals and offering concrete solutions. Actively participates in discussions and asks clarifying questions. Does not rule out compromises, but seeks practical solutions to existing problems.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It emphasizes the need to consider regional differences, particularly when setting differential rates for land tax and ensuring the economic livelihood of local residents. It supports greater autonomy and rights for local governments. It acknowledges the varying economic circumstances of municipalities.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports increasing the revenue base for local municipalities and criticizes the government's tax hikes. It calls for a systemic approach to wage growth in the cultural sector and adequate funding for essential public services, such as school meals. It emphasizes the necessity of balanced and sustainable financing.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It focuses primarily on issues of education and culture, emphasizing the principle of equal treatment (all children should receive the same school lunch). It supports fair compensation for cultural workers and the improvement of their social status. There is insufficient data available regarding other social issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on the legislation regarding local government, education, and cultural policy. It calls for the development of a long-term strategy for raising the salaries of cultural workers and the reorganization of the school meal system. It actively participates in policy-making discussions and presents concrete proposals.
4 Speeches Analyzed