Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

2025-03-26

Political Position
The speaker clearly opposes the revocation of voting rights for non-citizens in local elections, asserting that this is a political maneuver designed to eliminate competitors. They strongly support religious freedom and the continuation of integration programs, arguing that integration has, in fact, been successful. The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting democratic principles and constitutional rights.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong understanding of constitutional issues, particularly in the areas of religious freedom and voting rights. Shows knowledge of integration programs and uses specific examples to support their arguments. Is proficient in distinguishing between local and national politics and understanding their respective legal foundations.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
He/She employs a direct and confrontational approach, posing sharp rhetorical questions to opponents. He/She combines emotional narratives (such as the example of the Russian girl) with fact-based arguments. The tone is critical and challenging, using personal examples to illustrate his/her viewpoints.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All speeches occurred on a single day (March 26, 2025) during the plenary session, which indicates active participation in that specific discussion. (The subject) makes short, targeted interventions, focusing on one main topic—the issue of voting rights.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
He sharply criticizes the bill's proponents, accusing them of political manipulation and attempting to eliminate their competitors. He asserts that the opposition is confusing the significance of local and national elections. He warns specifically against the creation of a "fifth column" and faults the opponents for their lack of statesmanship.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Based on the limited data available, no willingness to cooperate is discernible. The speaker tends to adopt a confrontational stance and shows no readiness to compromise on the matter at hand.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Emphasizes the importance of local communities and their right to decide the fate of their locality. It specifically mentions the Pühtitsa Convent, which points to issues concerning the Ida-Viru County region. The focus is on protecting the autonomy of local municipalities.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
He mentions the strong performance of the Estonian economy as a crucial priority, but fails to disclose specific economic policy stances. The limited data available prevents a deeper analysis of his economic views.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It strongly supports religious freedom and the rights of religious communities, protecting the rights of Orthodox nuns. It advocates for maintaining the model of a multicultural society and continuing integration programs. It stresses that representatives of various nationalities can be just as patriotic as native-born citizens.

5 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on opposing the proposed voting rights bill, arguing that it violates constitutional principles. It questions the priorities of the legislature, asserting that national defense and the economy should be more important than restricting the franchise. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to the constitution in the lawmaking process.

5 Speeches Analyzed