Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
2025-02-12
Political Position
The speaker clearly represents the views of the opposition, strongly emphasizing that over 70% of the population supports the opposition, and demanding that the government include opposition politicians more significantly in the decision-making process. These political positions are directed toward criticizing the government and calling for constructive cooperation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates strong domain knowledge in local government operations, particularly concerning police and public order issues. Shows practical experience using the example of the city of Maardu, detailing the problem of relocating the police precinct and how it was resolved at the local government level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs a courteous yet straightforward style, always beginning with the polite phrase, "Thank you, good/esteemed Chairman." The rhetoric is practical and concrete, utilizing real-life examples, such as the official—"the poor woman"—who has to cope with aggressive dog owners and their dogs.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All three interventions occurred on the same day (February 12, 2025) in the plenary session, demonstrating active participation in parliamentary debates. These addresses were directed both at the Prime Minister and fellow colleagues, highlighting regular attendance at the sittings.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker adopts a clear opposition stance toward the government while maintaining a constructive tone. Criticism is not directed at individuals but demands concrete answers regarding political decisions and greater inclusion of the opposition, citing public support.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It demonstrates openness to cooperation, calling for greater inclusion of the opposition in the decision-making process. It emphasizes that this would benefit both the ruling parties and the people of Estonia, showcasing a readiness for compromise and a constructive approach.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses intensely on local issues, specifically using the city of Maardu as an example. It highlights the general challenges faced by local municipalities regarding the lack of police presence, demonstrating a deep understanding of regional disparities and problems at the local level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
They are specifically asking about the use of 2.6 billion euros, demanding clarification on the substance of the investments and the steps being taken. This demonstrates an interest in the transparency of how public funds are used and in responsible fiscal policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
This raises issues of gender equality, highlighting the safety of women in the workplace, particularly when female officers must handle aggressive dog owners and animals without police assistance. It also demonstrates concern for the protection of vulnerable groups.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Supports the updating of the Law on Owning and Raising Dogs (KOKS), referring to it as a "very good bill" and noting that it "has been long overdue for renewal." The focus is on resolving practical implementation issues within the legislation.
3 Speeches Analyzed