Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-12-12
Political Position
The speaker strongly advocates for increased government transparency, particularly regarding the public disclosure of representation costs. They adopt a distinctly critical stance toward the government's fiscal policy, highlighting unwarranted budget cuts and the overall lack of clarity in the budget. Furthermore, they indicate moderate support for the opposition member's transparency improvement initiative.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates strong knowledge of budgetary processes and the functioning of local government. Uses concrete examples (such as finding 800 million euros, the closure of police stations) and demonstrates detailed familiarity with the cooperation between local authorities and the state. Has a solid grasp of public sector cost control issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It uses a polite but critical tone, always beginning with courteous forms of address. It relies on concrete examples and facts to support its arguments. The style is direct and practical, utilizing emotionally charged phrases such as "closing down an entire police precinct" to emphasize the criticism.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All three speeches were delivered during the plenary session on the same day (December 12, 2024), indicating active involvement in the debates. They consistently raise questions and demand clarification, demonstrating sustained interest in the subject matter. A structured approach is maintained when posing questions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharply criticizes the government's budget policy and the ministers' apparent incomprehension of the budget. Specific unjustified cuts (such as the police stations in Lasnamäe and Maardu) are highlighted as examples of the government's flawed decisions. The criticism is mainly policy-based, not personal.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Demonstrates openness to collaboration by supporting the opposition member's initiative aimed at enhancing transparency. It recognizes the constructive role of local municipalities in addressing national issues (such as providing free premises for the police). Poses constructive questions intended to improve the process.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It places a heavy focus on local issues, particularly the closure of police precincts in the Lasnamäe and Maardu areas. It emphasizes the role and responsibility of local governments in providing services to citizens. It demonstrates a deep understanding of the challenges faced at the local level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports strict cost control and transparency in the public sector. It criticizes the government's inability to understand and control the budget, citing, for example, the "discovery" of 800 million euros at the end of the year. It demands that expenditures be proportionate and aligned with public interests.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on improving budget transparency and control. Supports legislative initiatives that would increase government accountability regarding representation expenses. Shows interest in refining public sector cost control mechanisms.
3 Speeches Analyzed